Workshop on Prediction for Marine Resources 2006

 

Date: January 12 & 13, 2006

Place: Institute of Statistical Mathematics, the meeting room

This workshop is supported by The Institute of Statistical Mathematics,
Project Research (Developing predictive models for bycatch in tuna fisheries)

 

Program

 

Thursday, January 12

 

13:45-13:50   Opening  

 

13:50-14:40   Hiroshi Shono(National Research Institute of Far Seas Fisheries)

“Applications of Tweedie distribution to the CPUE standardization”

 

14:50-15:40 Hidetada Kiyofuji (Hokkaido University), Tsukasa Hokimoto (Tokyo University) and Sei-Ichi Saitoh (Hokkaido University) 

A spatiotemporal response model for chlorophyll-a distributions based on some oceanographic factors

 

16:00-16:50   Simon Hoyle (Inter-American Tropical Tuna Commission)

Population dynamics modeling for fisheries bycatch

 

Friday, January 13

 

10:00-10:50 Mihoko Minami(Institute of Statistical Mathematics)

Modelling shark bycatch: The zero-inflated negative binomial regression model with smoothing

 

11:00-11:50 Hiroaki Matsunaga (National Research Institute of Far Seas Fisheries, FRA)

Biological characteristics and CPUE trend of silky shark caught by Japanese tuna longline in the Pacific Ocean

 

13:30-14:20 Cleridy Lennert-Cody  (Inter-American Tropical Tuna Commission)    

Species associations in purse-seine catch-bycatch in the eastern Pacific Ocean

 

14:30-15:20   Shelley Clarke (Joint Institute for Marine and Atmospheric Research, University of Hawaii and National Research Institute of Far Seas Fisheries)

Methodological Issues in North Pacific Blue Shark Stock Assessment

 

Abstract

 

Thursday, January 12

 

13:50-14:40   Hiroshi Shono(National Research Institute of Far Seas Fisheries)

“Applications of Tweedie distribution to the CPUE standardization”

I focus on so-called zero-catch problem of CPUE (catch per unit effort) standardization. Because the traditional CPUE model with log-normal error structure can not be applied in this case, three methods have been often used as follow:

1) Ad hoc method to add the small constant value to all response variables.

2) Catch model with Poisson or negative binomial error structure.

3) Delta-type two-step model. (After estimating the ratio of zero-catch using logit or probit model, typical model such as CPUE-LogNormal or Catch-Poisson is applied to CPUE without zero-data.)

In this symposium, we mainly carried out the CPUE standardization of by-catch data including many observations with zero-catch caught by Japanese training vessels (e.g. bigeye thresher shark or silky shark in the north Pacific Ocean) using Tweedie distribution model. Tweedie distribution is a kind of extension of compound Poisson model derived from the stochastic process and this model has been applied to the rainfall forecast in the field of weather derivatives in Japan.

I performed CPUE standardization of actual by-catch data using catch model with negative binomial error through SAS package (Version 9.1.3) and Tweedie model through R software (Version 2.0.1). I also compared both results based on n-fold cross-validation. MSE (mean squared error) and Pearson's correlation coefficient was calculated based on the observed CPUE and the corresponding predicted CPUE obtained from the Catch Negative-Binomial model and/or Tweedie distribution. In this Tweedie model of R software, the power-parameter of variance function is initially computed using the grid search, after that the parameters of regression coefficient are estimated based on the framework of quasi-likelihood method.

I also introduce the results of comparison among Tweedie model, Catch Negative-Binomial model and/or CPUE-LogNormal model judging from the statistical performances, MSE and Pearson's correlation coefficient. In order to check the reliability of Tweedie model, simulation study assuming the statistical distributions may be necessary and useful.

 

14:50-15:40   Hidetada Kiyofuji (Hokkaido University), Tsukasa Hokimoto (Tokyo University) and Sei-Ichi Saitoh (Hokkaido University) 

“A spatiotemporal response model for chlorophyll-a distributions based on some oceanographic factors”

This study aims to develop a new spatiotemporal statistical model to evaluate spatiotemporal  chlorophyll a (chl-a) distributions over the Sea of Japan, derived from the satellite remote sensing data. Considering factors affected to the chl-a distributions, we employed satellite derived sea surface temperature (SST) and photosynthesis active radiation (PAR). Because preliminary spatial analysis, chl-a exhibit anisotropy and SST and PAR exhibit almost isotropy in the south-north and east-west directions. As a result of time series analysis of spatial correlations, chl-a and PAR showed autocorrelation which indicate seasonal cycles and SST showed stationary series, respectively. Based on the preliminary analysis, we have conducted numerical prediction experiments with changing temporal lag. We present results showing the ability of the proposed spatiotemporal model to predict one-month ahead changes in chl-a distribution. We evaluated the prediction accuracy numerically, as well as the predicted distributions in each season. The spatiotemporal prediction of remotely sensed data demonstrated in this study offers a powerful and innovative way by which to determine the high productivity areas that could be translated into potential fishing areas. The spatiotemporal statistical model provides a new way to derive detailed information on spatial and temporal dynamics of primary productivity in the Sea of Japan.

 

16:00-16:50   Simon Hoyle (Inter-American Tropical Tuna Commission)

“Population dynamics modeling for fisheries bycatch”

I present a population dynamics model of a species for which fisheries bycatch is a source of mortality. The bycatch data, which provide useful information about the population dynamics, are integrated with other data sources in the model.

 

Friday, January 13

 

10:00-10:50 Mihoko Minami (Institute of Statistical Mathematics)

“Modeling shark bycatch: The zero-inflated negative binomial regression model with smoothing”

In contrast to catch data on target species, catch data on non-target species may be characterized by many zero-valued observations, and depending on the species, may also include large values when aggregations of animals are incidentally killed. For modeling shark bycatch counts, we introduce zero-inflated negative binomial model with smoothing.

 

11:00-11:50 Hiroaki Matsunaga (National Research Institute of Far Seas Fisheries, FRA)

“Biological characteristics and CPUE trend of silky shark caught by Japanese tuna longline in the Pacific Ocean

The silky shark Carcharinus falciformis is one of the major pelagic species, reaching 3.3 m in total length, and widely distributed from tropical to subtropical waters. Tuna longline and purse seine fisheries catch this species incidentally year-round in the Pacific Ocean. Silky shark was third dominant species following blue shark and oceanic white-tip shark caught by the tuna longline fisheries in the tropical sea areas. The international concern about the conservation and management of sharks has been getting larger in recent years. It is necessary to accumulate the information on biology, ecology and stock status of sharks for the proper conservation and management. But there is not enough information about the silky shark. Therefore, the biological characteristics of silky shark were briefly reviewed and stock status in the Pacific Ocean was examined by the CPUE trend in this study.

Catch data of silky shark obtained by Japanese research and training vessels with tuna longline from tropical to subtropical areas in the Pacific Ocean were used for the analysis. CPUE (catch rate: number of catch/1000 hooks) of silky shark was large in the tropical area. Standardized CPUE calculated with Generalized Linear Model (GLM) assuming negative binominal distribution during 1992-2003 was fluctuated but neither significant increasing nor decreasing trend was observed. Comparing CPUE from above data with those from old ones during 1967-1971 in the tropical water, there was not much difference between the two series of CPUE. Therefore, it is suggested that tuna longline did not give a significant impact on silky shark stock in the Pacific Ocean.

 

13:30-14:20 Cleridy Lennert-Cody  (Inter-American Tropical Tuna Commission)

“Species associations in purse-seine catch-bycatch in the eastern Pacific Ocean”

A preliminary analysis of species associations in purse-seine catch data using cluster analysis and nonmetric multidimensional scaling is presented. Relationships between the main species associations identified in these analyses and fishery and environmental factors are explored using the random forest technique for classification. Results are compared for different years.

 

14:30-15:20   Shelley Clarke (Joint Institute for Marine and Atmospheric Research, University of Hawaii and National Research Institute of Far Seas Fisheries)

“Methodological Issues in North Pacific Blue Shark Stock Assessment”

In a recent stock assessment of blue shark (Prionace glauca) in the North Pacific several special methods were applied to overcome data limitations.  A key challenge facing the assessment was to derive species-specific data from logbook records which contained only an aggregated category of sharks.  This situation was complicated by instances of under- or non-reporting of by-caught sharks.  Various methods for handling such data were assessed and a reporting rate filter was applied.  Another important methodological issue involved assembling a total catch series from the various fleets catching blue sharks in the North Pacific.  This issue was addressed by using standardized blue shark catch per unit effort from Japan's longline fleets, and apportioned effort for other fleets, to predict catches for the other fleets.  In order to determine whether catch figures were realistic, recent estimates from the shark fin trade, of which blue shark is a major component, were adjusted and compared to the catch series.  The steps and assumptions involved in these methods will be discussed in view of their potential application to assessments of other species and areas.